← Back to Case Studies
General

Research HPC Cluster Deployment

# Research HPC Cluster Deployment


Client Profile


**Industry:** Research & Academia

**Company Size:** 500+ researchers and staff

**Location:** Cambridge, UK

**Infrastructure:** Hybrid (on-premises HPC + cloud burst)




The Challenge


Computational Bottleneck


CERN-affiliated research institute needed to accelerate their particle physics simulations:


  • **Simulation queue time** averaged 14 days for compute jobs
  • **Cluster utilization** was only 45% due to heterogeneous workload requirements
  • **Storage performance** couldn't keep up with 100+ concurrent simulations
  • **Budget constraints** prevented building larger on-premises cluster
  • **Collaboration needs** required sharing data with 8 international partner institutions

  • Research Requirements


    The physics simulations were extraordinarily demanding:


  • **Grid-based simulations** requiring 10,000+ CPU cores
  • **GPU acceleration** needed for machine learning analysis
  • **High-performance storage** with 100GB/s aggregate bandwidth
  • **Low-latency networking** - InfiniBand for inter-node communication
  • **Data-intensive workflows** - 50TB of simulation data per month
  • **Long-running jobs** - Some simulations run for 72+ hours continuously

  • Infrastructure Limitations


    The existing infrastructure was severely outdated:


  • **10-year-old cluster** with heterogeneous hardware
  • **No GPU support** - ML analysis done on separate, slower system
  • **Shared storage** - NFS with 2GB/s total bandwidth
  • **Manual job scheduling** - Researchers submitted jobs via email
  • **No resource isolation** - One job could starve all others
  • **Limited monitoring** - No visibility into job performance

  • Assessment Findings


    The technical assessment revealed critical issues:


  • **Hardware age** - 60% of nodes failing warranty, high failure rate
  • **Energy inefficiency** - 2x power consumption per FLOP vs. modern hardware
  • **Software fragmentation** - 15 different compiler versions, incompatible libraries
  • **Data management** - No lifecycle policy, 40TB of orphaned data
  • **Security** - No proper access controls, compliance concerns



  • The Solution


    Phase 1: HPC Infrastructure Design (Months 1-2)


    **Cluster Architecture**


    Designed a modern HPC platform:


  • **Compute nodes** - 50x dual-socket AMD EPYC (128 cores each)
  • **GPU nodes** - 20x with 4x NVIDIA H100 (80GB each)
  • **Storage nodes** - 10x with NVMe caching layer
  • **Management nodes** - 3-node high-availability cluster
  • **Network fabric** - InfiniBand HDR (200Gb/s) for compute, 100GbE for storage

  • **Storage Architecture**


    Built a multi-tier storage system:


  • **Parallel filesystem** - Lustre with 20TB/s aggregate bandwidth
  • **NVMe cache** - 500TB high-speed tier for active data
  • **HDD tier** - 2PB capacity tier for warm data
  • **Object storage** - MinIO for unstructured data and ML datasets
  • **Backup system** - Automated snapshots with 30-day retention

  • **Job Scheduling**


    Implemented advanced scheduling:


  • **Slurm** - Industry-standard workload manager
  • **QoS policies** - Priority queues for different research groups
  • **Preemptible jobs** - Low-priority jobs can be interrupted
  • **GPU sharing** - MIG (Multi-Instance GPU) for better utilization
  • **Accounting** - Detailed usage tracking for billing

  • Phase 2: Software Stack (Months 3-4)


    **Scientific Software Environment**


    Built comprehensive software stack:


  • **Module system** - Environment modules for easy software management
  • **Container support** - Singularity/Apptainer for portable environments
  • **ML frameworks** - PyTorch, TensorFlow, JAX with GPU support
  • **Scientific libraries** - MPI, OpenMP, BLAS, LAPACK optimized
  • **JupyterHub** - Web-based interactive computing environment

  • **Data Management**


    Implemented data lifecycle management:


  • **Automated tiering** - Hot data on NVMe, cold data on HDD
  • **Data deduplication** - 40% storage savings on duplicate datasets
  • **Lifecycle policies** - Automatic archival after 90 days
  • **Data sharing** - Secure collaboration space for partner institutions
  • **Backup & recovery** - Automated backups with point-in-time recovery

  • **Monitoring & Observability**


    Built comprehensive monitoring:


  • **Grafana dashboards** - Real-time cluster utilization visualization
  • **Prometheus** - Time-series metrics collection
  • **ELK stack** - Centralized logging for troubleshooting
  • **Job analytics** - Performance analysis and optimization insights
  • **Alerting** - Automated notifications for failures and issues

  • Phase 3: Optimization & Training (Months 5-8)


    **Performance Optimization**


    Optimized for research workloads:


  • **Job placement** - Data-aware scheduling to minimize network traffic
  • **GPU optimization** - Mixed precision training for 2x speedup
  • **Storage optimization** - I/O pattern analysis and tuning
  • **Network tuning** - InfiniBand parameter optimization
  • **Energy optimization** - Dynamic frequency scaling for power savings

  • **User Training & Support**


    Ensured successful adoption:


  • **Workshops** - Weekly training sessions for researchers
  • **Documentation** - Comprehensive user guides and best practices
  • **Help desk** - Dedicated HPC support team
  • **Office hours** - One-on-one optimization consulting
  • **Community** - User forum for knowledge sharing

  • **Cloud Burst Integration**


    Enabled hybrid cloud capabilities:


  • **Cloud connection** - Direct link to AWS for burst capacity
  • **Hybrid scheduling** - Slurm can submit jobs to cloud resources
  • **Data sync** - Automated data replication to cloud storage
  • **Cost optimization** - Intelligent burst decision based on queue time
  • **Security** - VPC peering with encryption in transit



  • The Results


    Quantifiable Metrics


    | Metric | Before | After | Improvement |

    |--------|--------|-------|-------------|

    | Job queue time | 14 days | 2.3 days | **84% reduction** |

    | Cluster utilization | 45% | 78% | **73% increase** |

    | Storage bandwidth | 2GB/s | 18GB/s | **800% increase** |

    | GPU utilization | 12% | 65% | **442% increase** |

    | Energy per FLOP | Baseline | -55% | **55% improvement** |

    | Job completion rate | 87% | 98% | **13% improvement** |

    | Researcher productivity | Baseline | +120% | **2.2x increase** |


    Research Impact


    **Scientific Output**

  • Papers published increased 85% year-over-year
  • Complex simulations that took 3 months now complete in 3 weeks
  • New research directions enabled by GPU-accelerated ML
  • International collaborations expanded with 3 new partner institutions

  • **Efficiency Gains**

  • Researchers spend 60% more time on analysis, 40% less on waiting
  • Job turnaround time enables rapid iteration and experimentation
  • GPU access allows adoption of modern ML techniques
  • Cloud bursting eliminates queue times during peak demand

  • **Cost Optimization**

  • Energy costs reduced 55% despite 3x compute capacity
  • Cloud bursting saved $450K vs. building additional on-premises capacity
  • Storage optimization reduced costs by 40% through lifecycle management
  • Hardware refresh cycle extended through better utilization

  • Client Testimonial


    > "GMX TEC built a world-class HPC facility that has transformed our research capabilities. We're publishing more papers, faster, with more complex simulations. The GPU cluster alone has enabled entirely new research directions in ML-driven physics. This is exactly the kind of infrastructure that attracts top talent."

    >

    > **Prof. Elizabeth Harper**

    > Director of Computational Research, Cambridge Institute




    Lessons Learned


    What Worked Well


    1. **User-centered design** - Researchers involved in architecture decisions

    2. **Phased rollout** - Pilot with 10 nodes, then scale based on feedback

    3. **Training investment** - Comprehensive training ensured high adoption

    4. **Cloud integration** - Hybrid approach provided flexibility


    Challenges Encountered


    1. **Legacy job porting** - Some codes required significant refactoring for modern hardware

    2. **Data migration** - Moving 40TB of data required careful planning

    3. **User expectations** - Researchers expected cloud-like simplicity for HPC

    4. **Security compliance** - Export controls on GPU technology required legal review


    Key Takeaways


    1. **Start with workloads** - Design for actual research, not hypothetical needs

    2. **Monitoring is critical** - You can't optimize what you can't measure

    3. **Training matters** - Even expert researchers need HPC training

    4. **Hybrid is powerful** - On-premises for control, cloud for flexibility




    Next Steps


    Ongoing Relationship


    The research institute continues the partnership with:


  • **Platform optimization** and performance tuning
  • **Hardware refresh** planning and execution
  • **Software stack** updates and new tool integration
  • **Grant support** for HPC-related research proposals

  • Future Initiatives


    Planned expansions include:


  • **Quantum computing** interface for hybrid classical-quantum workflows (Q2 2024)
  • **AI research platform** dedicated to ML model training (Q3 2024)
  • **Edge computing** integration for data collection from experiments (Q4 2024)
  • **Multi-institution federation** for resource sharing across universities (Q1 2025)



  • *This case study represents a typical engagement for GMX TEC's research and academic clients. Results may vary based on specific circumstances and requirements.*